RE: IPv6 day and tunnels

["Templin, Fred L" <Fred.L.Templin () boeing com>]

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Masataka Ohta [mailto:mohta () necom830 hpcl titech ac jp]
> Sent: Tuesday, June 12, 2012 2:12 PM
> To: Templin, Fred L
> Cc: Owen DeLong; nanog () nanog org
> Subject: Re: IPv6 day and tunnels
>
> Templin, Fred L wrote:
>
> > > As I already said, 9KB is fine for me.
> >
> > Then you will agree that accommodation of MTU diversity
> > is a MUST (my point).
>
> Not necessarily, as IPv4 can take care of itself and IPv6
> is hopeless.

IPv4 can take care of it how - with broken PMTUD or
with broken fragmentation/reassembly? And, you won't
get any argument from me that IPv6 has been stuck
for years for good reasons - but MTU failures can
soon be taken off the list.

Fred
fred.l.templin () boeing com