nanog mailing list archives

Re: Article: IPv6 host scanning attacks


From: Fernando Gont <fernando () gont com ar>
Date: Wed, 13 Jun 2012 19:46:51 -0300

On 06/13/2012 03:37 PM, Dave Hart wrote:
"published" and "available" are misleading at best.

It is not. Just scroll down the page, and you'll find the whole article.
-- it was easy to talk crap than to do that, right?

Yes, I'm an idiot for believing what I read on that site:

"Requires Free Membership to View"

Of course I should have expected that means "scroll past me and the
page of whitespace to view."

I wouldn't "announce" the publication of an article that implies the
hassle of a registration in order to read it.

While it's certainly not "as good as it can get" to have a banner saying
"require free membership to view" inserted in the middle of the article
body, it's still "acceptable" for me. (Since you're not the first one to
think that the article was not free, next time I'll probably make this
explicit such that possible trouble is avoided]).



I find it amazing the number of people that will talk crap when one
publishes something when compared to the number of people that provides
technical comments or criticism (even if it's "you're completely wrong
because of this and that).

The draft and the article raise valid points about the predictability
of widely-used MAC-derived IIDs, but it does not in any way justify
the headline "Analysis: Vast IPv6 address space actually enables IPv6
attacks."  Whomever wrote that should share their stash.

FWIW, the headline was replaced prior to publication. Put another way: I
agree with your comment regarding the headline.

Cheers,
-- 
Fernando Gont
e-mail: fernando () gont com ar || fgont () si6networks com
PGP Fingerprint: 7809 84F5 322E 45C7 F1C9 3945 96EE A9EF D076 FFF1





Current thread: