nanog mailing list archives
Re: Cogent for ISP bandwidth
From: Nicolai <nicolai-nanog () chocolatine org>
Date: Tue, 15 May 2012 09:58:03 -0500
On Mon, May 14, 2012 at 09:38:34PM -0500, Ameen Pishdadi wrote:
No way they stack up against level3 or any of the other 4 big tier 1s but if you throw them in a blend with level3 there shouldn't be any issue and I wouldn't pay more the .75 cents a meg for a gig
That's $7.50 per 1000mbps. Sign me up! Nicolai
Current thread:
- RE: Cogent for ISP bandwidth, (continued)
- RE: Cogent for ISP bandwidth Paul Stewart (May 16)
- Re: Cogent for ISP bandwidth Darius Jahandarie (May 16)
- Re: Cogent for ISP bandwidth PC (May 16)
- Re: Cogent for ISP bandwidth Marshall Eubanks (May 17)
- Re: Cogent for ISP bandwidth Darius Jahandarie (May 17)
- Re: Cogent for ISP bandwidth Robert Bonomi (May 17)
- Re: Cogent for ISP bandwidth Darius Jahandarie (May 17)
- Re: Cogent for ISP bandwidth Mark Andrews (May 17)
- Re: bgp.he.net (was: Cogent for ISP bandwidth) Rob Mosher (May 15)
- Re: Cogent for ISP bandwidth Jeroen van Aart (May 16)
- Re: Cogent for ISP bandwidth A. Pishdadi (May 15)
- Re: Cogent for ISP bandwidth Peter Kristolaitis (May 15)
- Message not available
- Re: Cogent for ISP bandwidth A. Pishdadi (May 15)
- RE: Cogent for ISP bandwidth Frank Bulk (May 15)
- RE: Cogent for ISP bandwidth Drew Weaver (May 15)
