nanog mailing list archives

Re: "authority" to route?

From: Richard Barnes <richard.barnes () gmail com>
Date: Fri, 16 Nov 2012 14:44:22 -0500

I think Heather was pointing out that this would be a good time to actually
use it.


On Fri, Nov 16, 2012 at 12:55 PM, <Valdis.Kletnieks () vt edu> wrote:

On Thu, 15 Nov 2012 23:05:39 -0800, Kyle Creyts said:

Jeez, isn't RPKI supposed to solve this problem?


That would presume the existence of a deployed system that
everybody actually used.

Current thread:

"authority" to route? Jim Mercer (Nov 12)
- Re: "authority" to route? Jimmy Hess (Nov 12)
- Re: "authority" to route? Joe Abley (Nov 14)
  - Re: "authority" to route? joel jaeggli (Nov 14)
    - Re: "authority" to route? Mark Gauvin (Nov 14)
    - Re: "authority" to route? Robert Glover (Nov 14)
- RE: "authority" to route? Schiller, Heather A (Nov 15)
  - Re: "authority" to route? Kyle Creyts (Nov 15)
    - Re: "authority" to route? Valdis . Kletnieks (Nov 16)
    - Re: "authority" to route? Richard Barnes (Nov 16)