nanog mailing list archives
Re: Big day for IPv6 - 1% native penetration
From: Måns Nilsson <mansaxel () besserwisser org>
Date: Sun, 25 Nov 2012 13:42:31 +0100
Subject: Re: Big day for IPv6 - 1% native penetration Date: Sun, Nov 25, 2012 at 04:29:15AM +0000 Quoting Dobbins, Roland (rdobbins () arbor net):
On Nov 25, 2012, at 10:09 AM, joel jaeggli wrote:from goeff huston's data they have more v6 at home.And not purposely, either - because it's enabled by default on recent client OSes. My guess is that a non-trivial fraction of observed IPv6 traffic today is unintentional.
This is excellent! It is not likely that any end-user traffic over IPv4 is intentionally sent over IPv4. It is sent to Facebook. (eh, faceb00c, of course) Likewise, the -4 and -6 options for SSH are there for debugging and fault mitigation, nothing else. I'm quite satisfied that this now is the norm. It's the only way we'll be able to restore e2e on the Internet and evolve beyond simple client-server models like TN3270^H^H^H^Hthe web. -- Måns Nilsson primary/secondary/besserwisser/machina MN-1334-RIPE +46 705 989668 I didn't order any WOO-WOO ... Maybe a YUBBA ... But no WOO-WOO!
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Current thread:
- Re: Big day for IPv6 - 1% native penetration, (continued)
- Re: Big day for IPv6 - 1% native penetration Blair Trosper (Nov 20)
- Re: Big day for IPv6 - 1% native penetration Tomas Podermanski (Nov 20)
- Re: Big day for IPv6 - 1% native penetration Michael Kratz (Nov 21)
- Re: Big day for IPv6 - 1% native penetration Jay (Nov 21)
- RE: Big day for IPv6 - 1% native penetration Frank Bulk (Nov 21)
- Re: Big day for IPv6 - 1% native penetration Jonathan Towne (Nov 21)
- Re: Big day for IPv6 - 1% native penetration Dobbins, Roland (Nov 24)
- Re: Big day for IPv6 - 1% native penetration joel jaeggli (Nov 24)
- Re: Big day for IPv6 - 1% native penetration Phil Regnauld (Nov 25)
