nanog mailing list archives
Re: IPv4 address length technical design
From: Tony Finch <dot () dotat at>
Date: Thu, 4 Oct 2012 19:19:43 +0100
Owen DeLong <owen () delong com> wrote:
Once host identifiers are no longer dependent on or related to topology, there's no reason a reasonable fixed-length cannot suffice.
Host identities should be cryptographic hashes of public keys, so you have to support algorithm agility, which probably implies variable length. Tony. -- f.anthony.n.finch <dot () dotat at> http://dotat.at/ Forties, Cromarty: East, veering southeast, 4 or 5, occasionally 6 at first. Rough, becoming slight or moderate. Showers, rain at first. Moderate or good, occasionally poor at first.
Current thread:
- RE: IPv4 address length technical design, (continued)
- RE: IPv4 address length technical design Siegel, David (Oct 05)
- Re: IPv4 address length technical design John Levine (Oct 05)
- Re: IPv4 address length technical design Barry Shein (Oct 05)
- Re: IPv4 address length technical design Fred Baker (fred) (Oct 05)
- Re: IPv4 address length technical design Cutler James R (Oct 03)
- Re: IPv4 address length technical design William Herrin (Oct 04)
- Re: IPv4 address length technical design Cutler James R (Oct 04)
- Re: IPv4 address length technical design William Herrin (Oct 04)
- Re: IPv4 address length technical design Owen DeLong (Oct 03)
- Re: IPv4 address length technical design George Herbert (Oct 03)
- Re: IPv4 address length technical design Tony Finch (Oct 04)
- Re: IPv4 address length technical design Owen DeLong (Oct 04)
- Re: IPv4 address length technical design Barry Shein (Oct 03)
- Re: IPv4 address length technical design Cutler James R (Oct 03)
- Re: IPv4 address length technical design George Herbert (Oct 03)
- Re: IPv4 address length technical design Valdis . Kletnieks (Oct 04)
