nanog mailing list archives
Re: IPv4 address length technical design
From: Sadiq Saif <sadiq () asininetech com>
Date: Wed, 3 Oct 2012 12:19:29 -0400
On Wed, Oct 3, 2012 at 12:13 PM, Chris Campbell <chris () ctcampbell com> wrote:
Is anyone aware of any historical documentation relating to the choice of 32 bits for an IPv4 address? Cheers.
I believe the relevant RFC is RFC 791 - https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc791 -- Sadiq S O< ascii ribbon campaign - stop html mail - www.asciiribbon.org
Current thread:
- IPv4 address length technical design Chris Campbell (Oct 03)
- Re: IPv4 address length technical design Sadiq Saif (Oct 03)
- Re: IPv4 address length technical design Kevin Broderick (Oct 03)
- Re: IPv4 address length technical design Seth Mos (Oct 03)
- Re: IPv4 address length technical design Izaac (Oct 03)
- Re: IPv4 address length technical design George Herbert (Oct 03)
- Re: IPv4 address length technical design William Herrin (Oct 03)
- Re: IPv4 address length technical design Owen DeLong (Oct 03)
- Re: IPv4 address length technical design Marco Hogewoning (Oct 04)
- Re: IPv4 address length technical design joel jaeggli (Oct 04)
- Re: IPv4 address length technical design Kevin Broderick (Oct 03)
- Re: IPv4 address length technical design Sadiq Saif (Oct 03)
- RE: IPv4 address length technical design Naslund, Steve (Oct 03)
- Re: IPv4 address length technical design Jeroen van Aart (Oct 29)
