nanog mailing list archives
Re: RPKI Pilot Participant Notice
From: Randy Bush <randy () psg com>
Date: Fri, 07 Sep 2012 15:55:15 +0900
Good morning Randy -
it is late afternoon
Are you indicating that RPKI services should be offered without any RPA (and/or CPS) at all, or that these agreements should legally adhere without explicit agreement? There is an statement expressing that CPS or RPA might benefit from the latter treatment in section 3.4 of the Internet PKI framework (RFC 3647), but it does not actually hold legally true at the present time. If you have more insight or clarity on this matter, it would be most welcome.
does arin run an irr instance? how much legal bs have you wrapped around it? randy
Current thread:
- Re: RPKI Pilot Participant Notice, (continued)
- Re: RPKI Pilot Participant Notice Mark Kosters (Sep 05)
- Re: RPKI Pilot Participant Notice Richard Barnes (Sep 05)
- Re: RPKI Pilot Participant Notice Christopher Morrow (Sep 05)
- Re: RPKI Pilot Participant Notice Gary Buhrmaster (Sep 05)
- Re: RPKI Pilot Participant Notice Danny McPherson (Sep 05)
- Re: RPKI Pilot Participant Notice Randy Bush (Sep 06)
- Re: RPKI Pilot Participant Notice Richard Barnes (Sep 05)
- Re: RPKI Pilot Participant Notice John Curran (Sep 06)
- Re: RPKI Pilot Participant Notice William Herrin (Sep 06)
- Re: RPKI Pilot Participant Notice Randy Bush (Sep 06)
- Re: RPKI Pilot Participant Notice John Curran (Sep 06)
- Re: RPKI Pilot Participant Notice Randy Bush (Sep 06)
- Re: RPKI Pilot Participant Notice John Curran (Sep 07)
- Re: RPKI Pilot Participant Notice Mark Kosters (Sep 05)
