nanog mailing list archives

Re: The End-To-End Internet (was Re: Blocking MX query)


From: Masataka Ohta <mohta () necom830 hpcl titech ac jp>
Date: Wed, 12 Sep 2012 07:15:57 +0900

(2012/09/11 20:52), valdis.kletnieks () vt edu wrote:
On Tue, 11 Sep 2012 05:51:53 +0900, Masataka Ohta said:

Anything written in RFC1796 should be ignored, because RFC1796, an
informational, not standard track, RFC, states so.

On the other hand, if you're relying on the fact that 1796 is informational

No, I don't.

It's Jimmy, Eliot and you who are relying on a non standard track
RFC to deny RFC3102 and all the non standard track RFCs, which is
the silly paradox.

Standard or not, we have Christian Huitema, John Postel, and Steve
Crocker

If you have some respect to them, don't involve them with your
silly paradox.

                                                Masataka Ohta


Current thread: