nanog mailing list archives
Re: Big Temporary Networks
From: Nick Hilliard <nick () foobar org>
Date: Sun, 16 Sep 2012 20:21:06 +0100
On 16/09/2012 19:30, Masataka Ohta wrote:
Thus, protocols heavily depending on broadcast/multicast, such as ND, will suffer.
ok, you've trolled me enough to ask why ND is worse than ARP on a wavelan network - in your humble opinion? Nick
Current thread:
- Re: Big Temporary Networks, (continued)
- Re: Big Temporary Networks Chris Adams (Sep 14)
- Re: Big Temporary Networks Jay Ashworth (Sep 14)
- Re: Big Temporary Networks Chris Adams (Sep 14)
- Re: Big Temporary Networks Måns Nilsson (Sep 15)
- Re: Big Temporary Networks Jay Ashworth (Sep 15)
- Re: Big Temporary Networks William Herrin (Sep 15)
- Re: Big Temporary Networks Jay Ashworth (Sep 15)
- Re: Big Temporary Networks Masataka Ohta (Sep 15)
- Re: Big Temporary Networks Jay Ashworth (Sep 16)
- Re: Big Temporary Networks Masataka Ohta (Sep 16)
- Re: Big Temporary Networks Nick Hilliard (Sep 16)
- Re: Big Temporary Networks Masataka Ohta (Sep 16)
- Re: Big Temporary Networks Nick Hilliard (Sep 17)
- Re: Big Temporary Networks Masataka Ohta (Sep 17)
- Re: Big Temporary Networks William Herrin (Sep 17)
- Re: Big Temporary Networks Masataka Ohta (Sep 18)
- Re: Big Temporary Networks William Herrin (Sep 18)
- Re: Big Temporary Networks Nick Hilliard (Sep 18)
- Re: Big Temporary Networks William Herrin (Sep 18)
- Re: Big Temporary Networks Seth Mos (Sep 19)
- Re: Big Temporary Networks Masataka Ohta (Sep 19)