nanog mailing list archives
Re: Big Temporary Networks
From: Randy Bush <randy () psg com>
Date: Wed, 19 Sep 2012 11:30:39 +0900
So I just want to point out that this is an utterly irrelevant topic. Worldcon is full to the brim with really smart people who can build good networks, but in every place large enough to host a Worldcon the owners of the building make money selling Internet access and don't want competition. The very best we've been able to do was create an Internet Lounge with good connectivity, and even that isn't acceptable at most locations.
when you borrow $5,000 from the bank, they own you. when you borrow $5,000,000, you own them. large conferences throw more weight and usually can do their own network. ymmv, of course. randy
Current thread:
- Re: Big Temporary Networks, (continued)
- Re: Big Temporary Networks Josh Baird (Sep 13)
- RE: Big Temporary Networks Dylan Bouterse (Sep 13)
- Re: Big Temporary Networks Jay Ashworth (Sep 13)
- Re: Big Temporary Networks Josh Baird (Sep 13)
- Re: Big Temporary Networks Nat Morris (Sep 13)
- Re: Big Temporary Networks Derek Ivey (Sep 13)
- Re: Big Temporary Networks Josh Baird (Sep 13)
- Re: Big Temporary Networks Jay Ashworth (Sep 13)
- Re: Big Temporary Networks Kauto Huopio (Sep 13)
- Re: Big Temporary Networks Randy Bush (Sep 18)
- Re: Big Temporary Networks Måns Nilsson (Sep 19)
- Re: Big Temporary Networks Leo Bicknell (Sep 14)
- Re: Big Temporary Networks Jay Ashworth (Sep 14)
- Re: Big Temporary Networks Jo Rhett (Sep 18)
- Re: Big Temporary Networks William Herrin (Sep 18)
- RE: Big Temporary Networks Naslund, Steve (Sep 18)
- Re: Big Temporary Networks William Herrin (Sep 18)
- Re: Big Temporary Networks Jo Rhett (Sep 18)
