nanog mailing list archives
Re: The Department of Work and Pensions, UK has an entire /8
From: Suresh Ramasubramanian <ops.lists () gmail com>
Date: Wed, 19 Sep 2012 09:51:27 +0530
On Wednesday, September 19, 2012, Mike Hale wrote:
"this is the arin vigilante cultural view of the world. luckily, the disease does not propagate sufficiently to cross oceans." I'd love to hear the reasoning for this. Why would it be bad policy to force companies to use the resources they are assigned or give them back to the general pool?
Er, just because it isn't announced in the global routing tables doesn't mean it isn't used. I work for a company that has one of those early allocation /8s. It is densely packed with hosts of one kind or the other - but you can't reach (and there is no business need for anybody at all to reach) them except at an office location or having vpn'd in to the company intranet. I rather suspect that this is the case with most such early class A / B / C allocations that aren't currently routed .. if the corporation isn't defunct you can safely assume that especially the /8s are heavily used. It makes all kinds of sense to seek out and reclaim allocations from defunct corporations because if the individual RIRs don't, then various spammers and botmasters will, as we've seen time and again in the past few years. --srs -- Suresh Ramasubramanian (ops.lists () gmail com)
Current thread:
- The Department of Work and Pensions, UK has an entire /8 Eugen Leitl (Sep 18)
- Re: The Department of Work and Pensions, UK has an entire /8 Jeroen Massar (Sep 18)
- Re: The Department of Work and Pensions, UK has an entire /8 Jimmy Hess (Sep 18)
- Re: The Department of Work and Pensions, UK has an entire /8 Randy Bush (Sep 18)
- Re: The Department of Work and Pensions, UK has an entire /8 Blair Trosper (Sep 18)
- Re: The Department of Work and Pensions, UK has an entire /8 Matthew Kaufman (Sep 18)
- Re: The Department of Work and Pensions, UK has an entire /8 Mike Hale (Sep 18)
- Re: The Department of Work and Pensions, UK has an entire /8 Matthew Kaufman (Sep 18)
- Re: The Department of Work and Pensions, UK has an entire /8 Suresh Ramasubramanian (Sep 18)
- Re: The Department of Work and Pensions, UK has an entire /8 Jo Rhett (Sep 18)
- Re: The Department of Work and Pensions, UK has an entire /8 Mark Andrews (Sep 18)
- Re: The Department of Work and Pensions, UK has an entire /8 Mike Hale (Sep 18)
- Re: The Department of Work and Pensions, UK has an entire /8 Mark Andrews (Sep 18)
- Re: The Department of Work and Pensions, UK has an entire /8 Jo Rhett (Sep 18)
- Re: The Department of Work and Pensions, UK has an entire /8 Jimmy Hess (Sep 18)
- Re: The Department of Work and Pensions, UK has an entire /8 John Osmon (Sep 19)
- Re: The Department of Work and Pensions, UK has an entire /8 Cutler James R (Sep 19)
- Re: The Department of Work and Pensions, UK has an entire /8 Jimmy Hess (Sep 19)
- Re: The Department of Work and Pensions, UK has an entire /8 Jimmy Hess (Sep 18)
- Re: The Department of Work and Pensions, UK has an entire /8 Jeroen Massar (Sep 18)
- Re: The Department of Work and Pensions, UK has an entire /8 Tim Franklin (Sep 19)
