nanog mailing list archives
Re: Throw me a IPv6 bone (sort of was IPv6 ignorance)
From: Adrian Bool <aid () logic org uk>
Date: Mon, 24 Sep 2012 23:34:30 +0100
On 24 Sep 2012, at 22:42, Mike Jones <mike () mikejones in> wrote:
While you could do something similar without the encapsulation this would require that every router on your network support routing on port numbers,
Well, not really. As the video pointed out, the system was designed to leverage hierarchy to reduce routing complexity. Using the hierarchy, port number routing is only required at the level where a routes diverge on a port basis - which if you're being sensible about such a deployment would only be at the edge of the access layer. aid
Current thread:
- Re: Throw me a IPv6 bone (sort of was IPv6 ignorance), (continued)
- Re: Throw me a IPv6 bone (sort of was IPv6 ignorance) Valdis . Kletnieks (Sep 21)
- Re: Throw me a IPv6 bone (sort of was IPv6 ignorance) Tore Anderson (Sep 22)
- Re: Throw me a IPv6 bone (sort of was IPv6 ignorance) Randy Bush (Sep 22)
- Re: Throw me a IPv6 bone (sort of was IPv6 ignorance) Mark Andrews (Sep 22)
- Re: Throw me a IPv6 bone (sort of was IPv6 ignorance) Tore Anderson (Sep 22)
- Re: Throw me a IPv6 bone (sort of was IPv6 ignorance) Mark Radabaugh (Sep 22)
- Re: Throw me a IPv6 bone (sort of was IPv6 ignorance) Tore Anderson (Sep 22)
- Re: Throw me a IPv6 bone (sort of was IPv6 ignorance) Tore Anderson (Sep 24)
- Re: Throw me a IPv6 bone (sort of was IPv6 ignorance) Adrian Bool (Sep 24)
- Re: Throw me a IPv6 bone (sort of was IPv6 ignorance) Mike Jones (Sep 24)
- Re: Throw me a IPv6 bone (sort of was IPv6 ignorance) Adrian Bool (Sep 24)
- Re: Throw me a IPv6 bone (sort of was IPv6 ignorance) Tore Anderson (Sep 24)
- Re: Throw me a IPv6 bone (sort of was IPv6 ignorance) Owen DeLong (Sep 24)
- Re: Throw me a IPv6 bone (sort of was IPv6 ignorance) Mark Andrews (Sep 21)
