nanog mailing list archives
Re: IPv6 Address allocation best practises for sites.
From: Tony Finch <dot () dotat at>
Date: Tue, 25 Sep 2012 00:56:13 +0100
William Herrin <bill () herrin us> wrote:
but I also can't imagine hosting more than 65,000 sites on a single server.
Demon's homepages service was based on IPv4 virtual hosting and had IIRC a /16 and two /18s allocated to it. It was a single web server with a few reverse proxies that took most of the load and that also had all the IP addresses. The Irix version used a cunning firewall configuration to accept connections to all the addresses without stupid numbers of virtual interfaces; the BSD version used a kernel hack. http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=kern/12071 On the web server we stuffed the IP address into the filesystem path name to find the document root. (Or used various evil hacks to map the IP address to a canonical virtual server host name before stuffing the latter in the path.) Tony. -- f.anthony.n.finch <dot () dotat at> http://dotat.at/ Forties, Cromarty: East, veering southeast, 4 or 5, occasionally 6 at first. Rough, becoming slight or moderate. Showers, rain at first. Moderate or good, occasionally poor at first.
Current thread:
- IPv6 Address allocation best practises for sites. John Mitchell (Sep 24)
- Re: IPv6 Address allocation best practises for sites. William Herrin (Sep 24)
- Re: IPv6 Address allocation best practises for sites. Tony Finch (Sep 24)
- Re: IPv6 Address allocation best practises for sites. John Levine (Sep 24)
- Re: IPv6 Address allocation best practises for sites. Jeff Wheeler (Sep 24)
- Re: IPv6 Address allocation best practises for sites. Owen DeLong (Sep 25)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: IPv6 Address allocation best practises for sites. Aleksi Suhonen (Sep 24)
- Re: IPv6 Address allocation best practises for sites. William Herrin (Sep 24)
