nanog mailing list archives
Re: /. Terabit Ethernet is Dead, for Now
From: Leo Bicknell <bicknell () ufp org>
Date: Thu, 27 Sep 2012 06:04:03 -0700
In a message written on Thu, Sep 27, 2012 at 08:58:09AM -0400, Darius Jahandarie wrote:
I recall 40Gbit/s Ethernet being promoted heavily for similar reasons as the ones in this article, but then 100Gbit/s being the technology that actually ended up in most places. Could this be the same thing happening?
Everything I've read sounds like a repeat of the same broken decision
making that happened last time.
That is unsurprising though, the same people are involved.
--
Leo Bicknell - bicknell () ufp org - CCIE 3440
PGP keys at http://www.ufp.org/~bicknell/
Attachment:
_bin
Description:
Current thread:
- /. Terabit Ethernet is Dead, for Now Eugen Leitl (Sep 27)
- Re: /. Terabit Ethernet is Dead, for Now Darius Jahandarie (Sep 27)
- Re: /. Terabit Ethernet is Dead, for Now Leo Bicknell (Sep 27)
- Re: /. Terabit Ethernet is Dead, for Now George Herbert (Sep 27)
- Re: /. Terabit Ethernet is Dead, for Now Jared Mauch (Sep 27)
- Re: /. Terabit Ethernet is Dead, for Now jim deleskie (Sep 27)
- Re: /. Terabit Ethernet is Dead, for Now Rosenthal Phil (Sep 27)
- Re: /. Terabit Ethernet is Dead, for Now Mikael Abrahamsson (Sep 27)
- Re: /. Terabit Ethernet is Dead, for Now Steve Meuse (Sep 27)
- Re: /. Terabit Ethernet is Dead, for Now Leo Bicknell (Sep 27)
- Re: /. Terabit Ethernet is Dead, for Now Masataka Ohta (Sep 29)
- Re: /. Terabit Ethernet is Dead, for Now Jimmy Hess (Sep 30)
- Re: /. Terabit Ethernet is Dead, for Now joel jaeggli (Sep 30)
- Re: /. Terabit Ethernet is Dead, for Now Masataka Ohta (Sep 30)
- Re: /. Terabit Ethernet is Dead, for Now Darius Jahandarie (Sep 27)
