nanog mailing list archives
Re: RFC becomes Visio
From: Joe Maimon <jmaimon () ttec com>
Date: Fri, 28 Sep 2012 17:35:02 -0400
Justin M. Streiner wrote:
On Fri, 28 Sep 2012, Joe Maimon wrote:Just got told by a Lightpath person that in order to do BGP on a customer gig circuit to them they would need a visio diagram (of what I dont know). Has anybody else seen this brain damage?I can understand wanting to diagram a complex design, so everyone involved has a clear picture of what needs to happen, but for an ISP to bring up BGP to a customer? If that's not something that can be done in a relatively cookie-cutter fashion, there is something horribly broken with that ISP. My diagram would be something along the lines of your_router --------[GIG-E WITH BGP]-------- my_router = :) your_router --------[GIG-E WITH NO BGP]-------- my_router = :( jms
I figured they are expecting something other than cookie cutter, so I gave them a multi session + multi hop. 4 boxes with labels, 4 lines and some router commands in vendor 'C' language in a text box.
If they dont like that, they can provide me with their own diagram. Someone did mention that perhaps its a vetting/hoop-jumping process.My takeaway is that it is always easier to not accept the circuit until BGP is up, rather then saving that for a step 2.
Joe
Current thread:
- Re: RFC becomes Visio, (continued)
- Re: RFC becomes Visio Randy Carpenter (Sep 28)
- Re: RFC becomes Visio Valdis . Kletnieks (Sep 28)
- Re: RFC becomes Visio Richard Porter (Sep 28)
- Re: RFC becomes Visio TJ (Sep 28)
- Re: RFC becomes Visio Bruce A. Mah (Sep 28)
- Re: RFC becomes Visio Gary E. Miller (Sep 28)
- Re: RFC becomes Visio Justin M. Streiner (Sep 28)
- Re: RFC becomes Visio Joe Maimon (Sep 28)
- Re: RFC becomes Visio Miles Fidelman (Sep 28)
- RE: RFC becomes Visio Chuck Church (Sep 28)
