Re: IPv6 Ignorance

[George Herbert <george.herbert () gmail com>]

My customer the Dark Matter local galaxy group beg to disagree; just because you cannot see them does not mean that you 
cannot feel them gravitationally.

Or route to them.


George William Herbert
Sent from my iPhone

On Sep 28, 2012, at 10:31 PM, "John R. Levine" <johnl () iecc com> wrote:

> > You won't have enough addresses for Dark Matter, Neutrinos, etc. Atoms
> > wind up using up about 63 bits (2^10^82) based on the current SWAG. The
> > missing mass is 84% of the universe.
>
> Fortunately, until we find it, it doesn't need addresses.
>
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: Randy Bush [mailto:randy () psg com]
> > > Sent: Monday, September 17, 2012 8:30 PM
> > > To: John Levine
> > > Cc: nanog () nanog org
> > > Subject: Re: IPv6 Ignorance
> > >
> > > > In technology, not much.  But I'd be pretty surprised if the laws of
> > > > arithmetic were to change, or if we were to find it useful to assign
> > > > IP addresses to objects smaller than a single atom.
> > >
> > > we assign them /64s
>
> Regards,
> John Levine, johnl () iecc com, Primary Perpetrator of "The Internet for Dummies",
> Please consider the environment before reading this e-mail. http://jl.ly