nanog mailing list archives
Re: Evaluating Tier 1 Internet providers
From: Valdis.Kletnieks () vt edu
Date: Tue, 27 Aug 2013 17:02:30 -0400
On Tue, 27 Aug 2013 13:45:34 -0700, "Eric Louie" said:
That's a good point with the Tier 2 providers. So that begs the question, why wouldn't I just get my upstream from a Tier 2? (Because my management is under the perception that we're better off with Tier 1 providers, but that doesn't mean their perception is accurate)
The good thing about your upstream being a Tier 2 is that it usually means that if somebody's baking a peering cake, you're not one of the AS's that's suffering. Hmmm... if you're going for a connection to a Tier 1, maybe "peering cakes per decade" is a valid criterion?
Attachment:
_bin
Description:
Current thread:
- Evaluating Tier 1 Internet providers Eric Louie (Aug 27)
- Re: Evaluating Tier 1 Internet providers Joe Abley (Aug 27)
- RE: Evaluating Tier 1 Internet providers Eric Louie (Aug 27)
- Re: Evaluating Tier 1 Internet providers Valdis . Kletnieks (Aug 27)
- RE: Evaluating Tier 1 Internet providers Eric Louie (Aug 27)
- Re: Evaluating Tier 1 Internet providers Blake Dunlap (Aug 27)
- RE: Evaluating Tier 1 Internet providers Eric Louie (Aug 27)
- RE: Evaluating Tier 1 Internet providers Eric Louie (Aug 27)
- Re: Evaluating Tier 1 Internet providers Joe Abley (Aug 27)
- Re: Evaluating Tier 1 Internet providers Tore Anderson (Aug 28)
- RE: Evaluating Tier 1 Internet providers Eric Louie (Aug 27)
- RE: Evaluating Tier 1 Internet providers Justin M. Streiner (Aug 27)
- Re: Evaluating Tier 1 Internet providers Ben Hatton (Aug 27)
- Re: Evaluating Tier 1 Internet providers Justin M. Streiner (Aug 27)
