nanog mailing list archives
Re: [SHAME] Spam Rats
From: "John Levine" <johnl () iecc com>
Date: 10 Jan 2013 04:42:13 -0000
Any moron can run a DNSBL. Many morons do. But that doesn't mean that anyone actually uses them.
They are yes. Emails are being blocked due to the listing on spamrats.
Please show us a copy of one of the failure messages. Feel free to redact any private information, but please leave the IP addresses and reject messages visible. R's, John PS: In my experience, customers who think that their mail is being rejected due to a DNSBL we never heard of are almost always mistaken. A message bounces due to some random reason, they look up their IP on one of those bazillion DNSBL lookup pages, find some obscure DNSBL that lists them, and leap to the conclusion that's the problem.
Current thread:
- [SHAME] Spam Rats Julian DeMarchi (Jan 09)
- Re: [SHAME] Spam Rats Suresh Ramasubramanian (Jan 09)
- Re: [SHAME] Spam Rats Julian DeMarchi (Jan 09)
- Re: [SHAME] Spam Rats Suresh Ramasubramanian (Jan 09)
- Re: [SHAME] Spam Rats Julian DeMarchi (Jan 09)
- Re: [SHAME] Spam Rats Suresh Ramasubramanian (Jan 09)
- Re: [SHAME] Spam Rats John Levine (Jan 09)
- Re: [SHAME] Spam Rats Julian DeMarchi (Jan 09)
- Re: [SHAME] Spam Rats Jon Lewis (Jan 09)
- Re: [SHAME] Spam Rats Julian DeMarchi (Jan 09)
- Re: [SHAME] Spam Rats William Herrin (Jan 10)
- Re: [SHAME] Spam Rats Suresh Ramasubramanian (Jan 09)
- Re: [SHAME] Spam Rats Joe Provo (Jan 10)
- Re: [SHAME] Spam Rats Suresh Ramasubramanian (Jan 09)
- Re: [SHAME] Spam Rats Suresh Ramasubramanian (Jan 10)
- Re: [SHAME] Spam Rats Jima (Jan 10)
- Re: [SHAME] Spam Rats Jared Mauch (Jan 10)
