nanog mailing list archives
Re: [SHAME] Spam Rats
From: Nicolai <nicolai-nanog () chocolatine org>
Date: Wed, 9 Jan 2013 22:51:09 -0600
On Thu, Jan 10, 2013 at 12:58:59PM +1000, Julian DeMarchi wrote:
This is the first RBL I have seen list a /24 for lack of PTRs.
Maybe because it's redundant: a PTR check should be automatic on any incoming SMTP connection. Just think of all the traffic their survey tool generated in compiling this totally useless list. The humanity! Nicolai
Current thread:
- Re: [SHAME] Spam Rats, (continued)
- Re: [SHAME] Spam Rats John Levine (Jan 10)
- Re: [SHAME] Spam Rats Robert Bonomi (Jan 10)
- Re: [SHAME] Spam Rats Tony Finch (Jan 11)
- Re: [SHAME] Spam Rats JP Viljoen (Jan 10)
- Re: [SHAME] Spam Rats Owen DeLong (Jan 10)
- Re: [SHAME] Spam Rats Chris Boyd (Jan 09)
- Re: [SHAME] Spam Rats Julian DeMarchi (Jan 09)
- Re: [SHAME] Spam Rats Rich Kulawiec (Jan 10)
- Re: [SHAME] Spam Rats Rich Kulawiec (Jan 09)
- Re: [SHAME] Spam Rats Barry Shein (Jan 10)
- Re: [SHAME] Spam Rats Nicolai (Jan 09)
- Re: [SHAME] Spam Rats Rob McEwen (Jan 09)
- Re: [SHAME] Spam Rats Julian DeMarchi (Jan 09)
- Re: [SHAME] Spam Rats Anne P. Mitchell, Esq. (Jan 10)
