
nanog mailing list archives
Re: [SHAME] Spam Rats
From: Daniel Taylor <dtaylor () vocalabs com>
Date: Thu, 10 Jan 2013 15:04:18 -0600
On 01/10/2013 02:59 PM, John Levine wrote:
It isn't a complete solution by itself, but SPF hardly breaks a sweat with IPv6 and helps with maintaining domain-name based blacklists.IMHO mail is one of the easiest "first things" to turn on for IPv6.You can certainly turn it on, and it will work at the current toy scale, but nobody has a clue how we're going to scale IPv4 spam management up for large scale IPv6. Anything that's obvious won't work.
-- Daniel Taylor VP Operations Vocal Laboratories, Inc dtaylor () vocalabs com 612-235-5711
Current thread:
- Re: [SHAME] Spam Rats, (continued)
- Re: [SHAME] Spam Rats Julian DeMarchi (Jan 09)
- Re: [SHAME] Spam Rats William Herrin (Jan 10)
- Re: [SHAME] Spam Rats Joe Provo (Jan 10)
- Re: [SHAME] Spam Rats Chris Adams (Jan 09)
- Re: [SHAME] Spam Rats Suresh Ramasubramanian (Jan 09)
- Re: [SHAME] Spam Rats Dave Sparro (Jan 10)
- Re: [SHAME] Spam Rats Suresh Ramasubramanian (Jan 10)
- Re: [SHAME] Spam Rats Jima (Jan 10)
- Re: [SHAME] Spam Rats Jared Mauch (Jan 10)
- Re: [SHAME] Spam Rats John Levine (Jan 10)
- Re: [SHAME] Spam Rats Daniel Taylor (Jan 10)
- Re: [SHAME] Spam Rats joel jaeggli (Jan 10)
- Re: [SHAME] Spam Rats Dave Sparro (Jan 10)
- Re: [SHAME] Spam Rats Karl Auer (Jan 10)
- Re: [SHAME] Spam Rats Suresh Ramasubramanian (Jan 10)
- Re: [SHAME] Spam Rats Suresh Ramasubramanian (Jan 10)
- Re: [SHAME] Spam Rats Matthias Leisi (Jan 10)
- RE: [SHAME] Spam Rats Karl Auer (Jan 09)
- Re: [SHAME] Spam Rats Mark Foster (Jan 09)