nanog mailing list archives
Re: De-funding the ITU
From: Dave Crocker <dhc2 () dcrocker net>
Date: Sun, 13 Jan 2013 10:01:58 -0800
On 1/12/2013 9:04 PM, Fred Baker (fred) wrote:
ITU-D and ITU-R do a lot of good work.
-R is excluded from the petition. (From a number of postings, it appears that many folk haven't noticed that.)
I don't know anything about -D.In the interest of adding some core information to the thread, could you provide a brief summary of its job and benefits (with any concerns that are broadly held)?
I'm not asking you to defend your views but to provide a most basic tutorial on -D. The more objective the better.
Thanks. d/ -- Dave Crocker Brandenburg InternetWorking bbiw.net
Current thread:
- Re: De-funding the ITU, (continued)
- Re: De-funding the ITU Eliot Lear (Jan 14)
- Re: De-funding the ITU Owen DeLong (Jan 14)
- Re: De-funding the ITU Bill Woodcock (Jan 14)
- Re: De-funding the ITU Nick Hilliard (Jan 14)
- Re: De-funding the ITU Owen DeLong (Jan 14)
- Re: De-funding the ITU Nick Hilliard (Jan 15)
- Re: De-funding the ITU Eric Brunner-Williams (Jan 14)
- Re: De-funding the ITU George Herbert (Jan 14)
- Re: De-funding the ITU John R. Levine (Jan 14)
- Re: De-funding the ITU Eric Brunner-Williams (Jan 13)
- Re: De-funding the ITU Dave Crocker (Jan 13)
- Re: De-funding the ITU Eliot Lear (Jan 13)
- Re: De-funding the ITU Owen DeLong (Jan 14)
- Re: De-funding the ITU Dave Crocker (Jan 13)
- Re: De-funding the ITU John R. Levine (Jan 13)
- Re: De-funding the ITU Jimmy Hess (Jan 13)
