nanog mailing list archives
Re: Gmail and SSL
From: Scott Howard <scott () doc net au>
Date: Tue, 1 Jan 2013 16:04:11 -0800
On Mon, Dec 31, 2012 at 6:07 AM, John R. Levine <johnl () iecc com> wrote:
Really, this isn't hard to understand. Current SSL signers do no more than tie the identity of the cert to the identity of a domain name. Anyone who's been following the endless crisis at ICANN about bogus WHOIS knows that domain names do not reliably identify anyone.
So you're saying that you'd have no problems getting a well-known-CA signed certificate for, say, pop.mail.yahoo.com? If you can't, then it would seem that the current process provides (at least) a better mechanism than just blindly accepting self-signed certificates, no? Also keep in mind that this particular argument is about the certs used to
submit mail to Gmail, which requires a separate SMTP AUTH within the SSL session before you can send any mail. This isn't belt and suspenders, this is belt and a 1/16" inch piece of duct tape.
Err.. no it's not. It's about the certs used when Gmail connects to a 3rd-party host to collect mail. ie, Google is the client, not the server. Scott
Current thread:
- Re: Gmail and SSL Christopher Morrow (Jan 01)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: Gmail and SSL Keith Medcalf (Jan 01)
- Re: Gmail and SSL Christopher Morrow (Jan 01)
- Re: Gmail and SSL Matthew Palmer (Jan 01)
- Re: Gmail and SSL Mike Jones (Jan 01)
- Re: Gmail and SSL Jimmy Hess (Jan 02)
- Re: Gmail and SSL Scott Howard (Jan 01)
- Re: Gmail and SSL Keith Medcalf (Jan 01)
- Re: Gmail and SSL Valdis . Kletnieks (Jan 02)
- Re: Gmail and SSL Steven Bellovin (Jan 02)
- Re: Gmail and SSL Randy Bush (Jan 02)
- Re: Gmail and SSL Steven Bellovin (Jan 02)
- Re: Gmail and SSL Seth David Schoen (Jan 02)
- Re: Gmail and SSL Steven Bellovin (Jan 02)
- Re: Gmail and SSL Jimmy Hess (Jan 02)
- Re: Gmail and SSL Steven Bellovin (Jan 02)
- Re: Gmail and SSL Christopher Morrow (Jan 02)
