nanog mailing list archives

Re: Netflow Nfsen Server Hardware


From: Christopher Morrow <morrowc.lists () gmail com>
Date: Thu, 17 Jan 2013 11:19:38 -0500

On Thu, Jan 17, 2013 at 11:16 AM, Joe Loiacono <jloiacon () csc com> wrote:
christopher.morrow () gmail com wrote on 01/17/2013 11:01:06 AM:

From: Christopher Morrow <morrowc.lists () gmail com>
To: Joe Loiacono/USA/CSC@CSC
Cc: Tim Calvin <tcalvin () tlsn net>, "nanog () nanog org" <nanog () nanog org>
Date: 01/17/2013 11:01 AM
Subject: Re: Netflow Nfsen Server Hardware
Sent by: christopher.morrow () gmail com

On Thu, Jan 17, 2013 at 9:05 AM, Joe Loiacono <jloiacon () csc com> wrote:
Tim Calvin <tcalvin () tlsn net> wrote on 01/16/2013 05:51:11 PM:

PowerEdge R610 -

    2x Intel E5540, 2.53GHz Quad Core Processor

    32GB RAM

    2x 300gb 10k 2.5" SAS HDD

Since netflow processing is generally I/O bound, you may want to invest
in
15K drives.

I had suggested off-list that perhaps primary storage as SSD was a
better path, is there a reason to not do that? (with some larger
storage on spinning-media for historical storage/query).

Nope, great suggestion. Just a cost consideration ...

ah, ok... I figure that even if you were to put in 2 || 3 SSD drives
in the 200gb range, one per controller, you'd get maximum throughput
for a few days of data at not very much of a premium, then back up /
near-line store the data longer term on spinning 2tb or so disks.


Current thread: