nanog mailing list archives
Re: CGN fixed/hashed nat question
From: "Dobbins, Roland" <rdobbins () arbor net>
Date: Wed, 23 Jan 2013 02:57:38 +0000
On Jan 23, 2013, at 4:52 AM, Dan Wing wrote:
If using the CGN configuration, then no logging event needs to be generated.
Behavioral/statistical telemetry is very important for security, traffic engineering/capacity planning, and troubleshooting purposes. The overwhelming need for it is orthogonal to any schemes for hashing NAT source/dest ports. What's needed in this regard for CGNs (for any NATs/proxies, really) is something analogous to Cisco's NSEL for ASA, hopefully implemented as IPFIX EEs. ----------------------------------------------------------------------- Roland Dobbins <rdobbins () arbor net> // <http://www.arbornetworks.com> Luck is the residue of opportunity and design. -- John Milton
Current thread:
- CGN fixed/hashed nat question Eric Oosting (Jan 21)
- Re: CGN fixed/hashed nat question Nick Hilliard (Jan 21)
- Re: CGN fixed/hashed nat question Eric Oosting (Jan 21)
- RE: CGN fixed/hashed nat question Dan Wing (Jan 22)
- Re: CGN fixed/hashed nat question Dobbins, Roland (Jan 22)
- Re: CGN fixed/hashed nat question Nick Hilliard (Jan 23)
- Re: CGN fixed/hashed nat question Sander Steffann (Jan 23)
- Re: CGN fixed/hashed nat question Randy Bush (Jan 23)
- Re: CGN fixed/hashed nat question Nick Hilliard (Jan 23)
- Re: CGN fixed/hashed nat question Dobbins, Roland (Jan 22)
- Re: CGN fixed/hashed nat question Jean-Francois Mezei (Jan 23)
- Re: CGN fixed/hashed nat question William Herrin (Jan 23)
- Re: CGN fixed/hashed nat question Christian Kratzer (Jan 23)
- Re: CGN fixed/hashed nat question William Herrin (Jan 23)
- Re: CGN fixed/hashed nat question Nick Hilliard (Jan 21)
- Re: CGN fixed/hashed nat question Simon Perreault (Jan 23)
