nanog mailing list archives
Re: AS3549 Level3/GBLX carrying routing for 10.0.0.0/8
From: Christopher Morrow <morrowc.lists () gmail com>
Date: Mon, 22 Jul 2013 15:44:39 -0400
On Mon, Jul 22, 2013 at 3:36 PM, Siegel, David <David.Siegel () level3 com> wrote:
This should now be fixed. As a general matter of policy, we do filter out 10/8, but somehow the filter list for a customer was empty which then defaults to an implicit accept. We're in the process of improving our config audits to catch this in the future.
what happens if they register a route object for 10/8? :)
Dave -----Original Message----- From: Larry Sheldon [mailto:LarrySheldon () cox net] Sent: Saturday, July 20, 2013 10:31 PM To: nanog () nanog org Subject: Re: AS3549 Level3/GBLX carrying routing for 10.0.0.0/8 On 7/20/2013 11:26 PM, Yang Yu wrote:It appears AS3549 is announcing 10.0.0.0/8. I noticed it from an AS3549 customer.I wonder why people don't drop any update that contains stuff like RFC 1918 space. -- Requiescas in pace o email Two identifying characteristics of System Administrators: Ex turpi causa non oritur actio Infallibility, and the ability to learn from their mistakes. (Adapted from Stephen Pinker)
Current thread:
- AS3549 Level3/GBLX carrying routing for 10.0.0.0/8 Yang Yu (Jul 20)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: AS3549 Level3/GBLX carrying routing for 10.0.0.0/8 Larry Sheldon (Jul 20)
- RE: AS3549 Level3/GBLX carrying routing for 10.0.0.0/8 Siegel, David (Jul 22)
- Re: AS3549 Level3/GBLX carrying routing for 10.0.0.0/8 Christopher Morrow (Jul 22)
- Re: AS3549 Level3/GBLX carrying routing for 10.0.0.0/8 chip (Jul 22)
- RE: AS3549 Level3/GBLX carrying routing for 10.0.0.0/8 Siegel, David (Jul 22)
