nanog mailing list archives
RE: Policy-based routing is evil? Discuss.
From: Phil Bedard <bedard.phil () gmail com>
Date: Fri, 11 Oct 2013 15:54:24 -0700
I'm having a discussion with a small network in a part of the world
where bandwidth is scarce and multiple DSL lines are often used for
upstream links. The topic is policy-based routing, which is being
described as "load balancing" where end-user traffic is assigned to a
line according to source address.
In my opinion the main problems with this are:
- It's brittle, when a line fails, traffic doesn't re-route
- None of the usual debugging tools work properly
- Adding a new user is complicated because it has to be done in (at
least) two places
But I'm having a distinct lack of success locating rants and diatribes
or even well-reasoned articles supporting this opinion.
Am I out to lunch?
-w
--
The University of Edinburgh is a charitable body, registered in
Scotland, with registration number SC005336.
Attachment:
_bin
Description:
Current thread:
- Re: Policy-based routing is evil? Discuss., (continued)
- Re: Policy-based routing is evil? Discuss. Christopher Morrow (Oct 11)
- Re: Policy-based routing is evil? Discuss. Stuart Sheldon (Oct 11)
- Re: Policy-based routing is evil? Discuss. Jay Ashworth (Oct 11)
- Re: Policy-based routing is evil? Discuss. Fred Reimer (Oct 11)
- Re: Policy-based routing is evil? Discuss. John Kristoff (Oct 11)
- Re: Policy-based routing is evil? Discuss. Leo Bicknell (Oct 11)
- Re: Policy-based routing is evil? Discuss. Jimmy Hess (Oct 11)
- Re: Policy-based routing is evil? Discuss. Octavio Alvarez (Oct 12)
- Re: Policy-based routing is evil? Discuss. Jimmy Hess (Oct 12)
- Re: Policy-based routing is evil? Discuss. John Osmon (Oct 12)
- RE: Policy-based routing is evil? Discuss. Phil Bedard (Oct 11)
- Re: Policy-based routing is evil? Discuss. Bruce Pinsky (Oct 11)
- Re: Policy-based routing is evil? Discuss. Jeff Kell (Oct 11)
- Re: Policy-based routing is evil? Discuss. Bruce Pinsky (Oct 11)
