nanog mailing list archives
Re: comcast ipv6 PTR
From: Lee Howard <Lee () asgard org>
Date: Wed, 16 Oct 2013 11:43:56 +0100
On 10/15/13 5:48 PM, "Bjørn Mork" <bjorn () mork no> wrote:
No, renumbering is not going to be seemless. Yes, a smarter person could automate everything I list above, but we all know that's not going to happen.
The 6renum WG at IETF just closed, with a list of work items remaining for other WGs to complete. I recommend RFC6879 in particular, with RFC6866 describing some parts of the problems and RFC7010 being the outstanding work. The IETF has generally been taken as an assumption that the home network is unmanaged (see the Homenet charter and architecture document, for instance). The administrator of a managed network can follow RFC6879 and renumber pretty seamlessly. In the unmanaged home, since everything is automatic, renumbering should be seamless. Yes, more tools are needed (thus RFC7010). Lee
Current thread:
- Re: comcast ipv6 PTR, (continued)
- Re: comcast ipv6 PTR Joe Abley (Oct 15)
- Re: comcast ipv6 PTR John R. Levine (Oct 15)
- Re: comcast ipv6 PTR Mark Andrews (Oct 15)
- Re: comcast ipv6 PTR John R. Levine (Oct 15)
- Re: comcast ipv6 PTR Tim Franklin (Oct 15)
- Re: comcast ipv6 PTR TJ (Oct 15)
- Re: comcast ipv6 PTR Michael Thomas (Oct 15)
- Re: comcast ipv6 PTR Bjørn Mork (Oct 15)
- Re: comcast ipv6 PTR Michael Thomas (Oct 15)
- Re: comcast ipv6 PTR Mark Andrews (Oct 15)
- Re: comcast ipv6 PTR Lee Howard (Oct 17)
- Re: comcast ipv6 PTR Bjørn Mork (Oct 17)
- Re: comcast ipv6 PTR Mark Andrews (Oct 17)
- Re: comcast ipv6 PTR Jean-Francois . TremblayING (Oct 15)
- Re: comcast ipv6 PTR John R. Levine (Oct 15)
- Re: comcast ipv6 PTR joel jaeggli (Oct 15)
- Re: comcast ipv6 PTR joel jaeggli (Oct 15)
- Re: comcast ipv6 PTR Mark Andrews (Oct 15)
- Re: comcast ipv6 PTR Bjørn Mork (Oct 15)
- Re: comcast ipv6 PTR Joe Abley (Oct 15)
- Re: comcast ipv6 PTR Bjørn Mork (Oct 15)
