nanog mailing list archives
RE: Fwd: Serious bug in ubiquitous OpenSSL library: "Heartbleed"
From: David Hubbard <dhubbard () dino hostasaurus com>
Date: Tue, 8 Apr 2014 12:11:32 -0400
1.0.1 was not deployed until RHEL 6.5. RedHat released patches for RHEL last night, and CentOS followed suit a few minutes later. -----Original Message----- From: Michael Thomas [mailto:mike () mtcc com] Sent: Tuesday, April 08, 2014 12:03 PM To: nanog () nanog org Subject: Re: Fwd: Serious bug in ubiquitous OpenSSL library: "Heartbleed" Just as a data point, I checked the servers I run and it's a good thing I didn't reflexively update them first. On Centos 6.0, the default openssl is 1.0.0 which supposedly doesn't have the vulnerability, but the ones queued up for update do. I assume that redhat will get the patched version soon but be careful! Mike On 04/07/2014 10:06 PM, Paul Ferguson wrote:
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA256 I'm really surprised no one has mentioned this here yet... FYI, - - ferg Begin forwarded message:From: Rich Kulawiec <rsk () gsp org> Subject: Serious bug in ubiquitous OpenSSL library: "Heartbleed" Date: April 7, 2014 at 9:27:40 PM EDT This reaches across many versions of Linux and BSD and, I'd presume, into some versions of operating systems based on them. OpenSSL is used in web servers, mail servers, VPNs, and many other places. Writeup: Heartbleed: Serious OpenSSL zero day vulnerability revealed http://www.zdnet.com/heartbleed-serious-openssl-zero-day-vulnerabilit y-revealed-7000028166/ Technical details: Heartbleed Bug http://heartbleed.com/ OpenSSL versions affected (from link just above): OpenSSL 1.0.1 through 1.0.1f (inclusive) are vulnerable OpenSSL 1.0.1g is NOT vulnerable (released today, April 7, 2014) OpenSSL 1.0.0 branch is NOT vulnerable OpenSSL 0.9.8 branch is NOT vulnerable- -- Paul Ferguson VP Threat Intelligence, IID PGP Public Key ID: 0x54DC85B2 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.22 (MingW32) Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/ iF4EAREIAAYFAlNDg9gACgkQKJasdVTchbIrAAD9HzKaElH1Tk0oIomAOoSOvfJf 3Dvt4QB54os4/yewQQ8A/0dhFZ/YuEdA81dkNfR9KIf1ZF72CyslSPxPvkDcTz5e =aAzE -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Current thread:
- Re: Serious bug in ubiquitous OpenSSL library: "Heartbleed", (continued)
- Re: Serious bug in ubiquitous OpenSSL library: "Heartbleed" Doug Barton (Apr 08)
- Re: Serious bug in ubiquitous OpenSSL library: "Heartbleed" Valdis . Kletnieks (Apr 09)
- Re: Serious bug in ubiquitous OpenSSL library: "Heartbleed" Jima (Apr 09)
- Re: Serious bug in ubiquitous OpenSSL library: "Heartbleed" Me (Apr 09)
- Re: Serious bug in ubiquitous OpenSSL library: "Heartbleed" Patrick W. Gilmore (Apr 09)
- Re: Serious bug in ubiquitous OpenSSL library: "Heartbleed" Niels Bakker (Apr 09)
- Re: Serious bug in ubiquitous OpenSSL library: "Heartbleed" Me (Apr 09)
- Re: Serious bug in ubiquitous OpenSSL library: "Heartbleed" Niels Bakker (Apr 09)
- Re: Serious bug in ubiquitous OpenSSL library: "Heartbleed" Me (Apr 09)
- Re: Fwd: Serious bug in ubiquitous OpenSSL library: "Heartbleed" Steve Clark (Apr 08)
- Re: Serious bug in ubiquitous OpenSSL library: "Heartbleed" Laszlo Hanyecz (Apr 08)
- Re: Serious bug in ubiquitous OpenSSL library: "Heartbleed" Chris Adams (Apr 08)
