nanog mailing list archives

Re: DNSSEC?

From: Bill Woodcock <woody () pch net>
Date: Fri, 11 Apr 2014 11:50:28 -0700


On Apr 11, 2014, at 11:35 AM, Barry Shein <bzs () world std com> wrote:


So, DNSSEC is also compromised by this heartbleed bug, right?


Nope, apples and oranges.

http://www.afilias.info/webfm_send/32

The only point of intersection I can think of is an indirect one, and unfortunately not much used yet: DANE 
certificates for TLS/SSL connections.

                                -Bill

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail

Current thread:

DNSSEC? Barry Shein (Apr 11)
- Re: DNSSEC? Doug Barton (Apr 11)
  - Re: DNSSEC? Barry Shein (Apr 11)
    - Re: DNSSEC? Christopher Morrow (Apr 11)
- Re: DNSSEC? Bill Woodcock (Apr 11)
- Re: DNSSEC? Chris Adams (Apr 11)
  - Re: DNSSEC? Carsten Bormann (Apr 11)
    - Re: DNSSEC? Matt Palmer (Apr 11)
    - Re: DNSSEC? Robert Drake (Apr 11)
    - Re: DNSSEC? Mark Andrews (Apr 11)
    - Re: DNSSEC? Jimmy Hess (Apr 11)
    - Re: DNSSEC? Mark Andrews (Apr 11)
    - Re: DNSSEC? shawn wilson (Apr 12)
    - Re: DNSSEC? Michael Thomas (Apr 12)
    - Re: DNSSEC? Jimmy Hess (Apr 12)

(Thread continues...)