nanog mailing list archives
Re: responding to DMARC breakage
From: Miles Fidelman <mfidelman () meetinghouse net>
Date: Sat, 12 Apr 2014 13:12:36 -0400
Valdis.Kletnieks () vt edu wrote:
On Sat, 12 Apr 2014 10:12:09 -0400, Miles Fidelman said:It occurs to me that Yahoo's deployment of DMARC p=reject, and the choice of several big mail operators to honor that, has created a situation not unlike a really routing table or nameserver, snafu ---It's more like a peering war. Time for somebody to either bake a cake, or find alternate transit providers.
Aaargghhh - what a horrible, but accurate analogy. Worse probably - more like a peering war with a large broadband carrier, at the edge, where it's harder to find alternate transport.
Sigh.. Miles -- In theory, there is no difference between theory and practice. In practice, there is. .... Yogi Berra
Current thread:
- responding to DMARC breakage Miles Fidelman (Apr 12)
- Re: responding to DMARC breakage William Herrin (Apr 12)
- Re: responding to DMARC breakage Miles Fidelman (Apr 12)
- Re: responding to DMARC breakage Valdis . Kletnieks (Apr 12)
- Re: responding to DMARC breakage Miles Fidelman (Apr 12)
- Re: responding to DMARC breakage Jim Popovitch (Apr 12)
- Re: responding to DMARC breakage Dave Crocker (Apr 12)
- Re: responding to DMARC breakage Jim Popovitch (Apr 12)
- Re: responding to DMARC breakage Miles Fidelman (Apr 12)
- Re: responding to DMARC breakage Miles Fidelman (Apr 12)
- Re: responding to DMARC breakage Matthew Petach (Apr 13)
- Re: responding to DMARC breakage Miles Fidelman (Apr 13)
- Re: responding to DMARC breakage William Herrin (Apr 12)
- Re: responding to DMARC breakage Joly MacFie (Apr 12)
- Re: responding to DMARC breakage Jim Popovitch (Apr 12)
