nanog mailing list archives
Re: The FCC is planning new net neutrality rules. And they could enshrine pay-for-play. - The Washington Post
From: Andris Kalnozols <andris () hpl hp com>
Date: Thu, 24 Apr 2014 20:50:42 -0700
On 4/24/2014 8:38 PM, Larry Sheldon wrote:
On 4/24/2014 10:23 PM, Patrick W. Gilmore wrote:The invisible hand of the market cannot fix problems when there is a monopoly. Put in economic terms, a player with Market Power is extracting Rents. (Capitalization is intentional.) Regulating monopolies allows a market to work, not the opposite.Regulating monopolies protects monopolies from competition. Monopolies can not persist without regulation. A regulated monopoly is a monopoly, with all of the powers granted to monopolies by regulation.
"In theory, there is no difference between theory and practice. In practice, there is." --- Yogi Berra Due to the existence of Regulatory Capture, Mr. Gilmore has a point.
Current thread:
- Re: The FCC is planning new net neutrality rules. And they could enshrine pay-for-play. - The Washington Post, (continued)
- Re: The FCC is planning new net neutrality rules. And they could enshrine pay-for-play. - The Washington Post Jack Bates (Apr 24)
- Re: The FCC is planning new net neutrality rules. And they could enshrine pay-for-play. - The Washington Post Wayne E Bouchard (Apr 24)
- Re: The FCC is planning new net neutrality rules. And they could enshrine pay-for-play. - The Washington Post Patrick W. Gilmore (Apr 24)
- Message not available
- Re: The FCC is planning new net neutrality rules. And they could enshrine pay-for-play. - The Washington Post Larry Sheldon (Apr 24)
- Re: The FCC is planning new net neutrality rules. And they could enshrine pay-for-play. - The Washington Post Patrick W. Gilmore (Apr 24)
- Re: The FCC is planning new net neutrality rules. And they could enshrine pay-for-play. - The Washington Post Everton Marques (Apr 24)
- Re: The FCC is planning new net neutrality rules. And they could enshrine pay-for-play. - The Washington Post Patrick W. Gilmore (Apr 24)
- Message not available
- Re: The FCC is planning new net neutrality rules. And they could enshrine pay-for-play. - The Washington Post Larry Sheldon (Apr 24)
- Re: The FCC is planning new net neutrality rules. And they could enshrine pay-for-play. - The Washington Post Allen McKinley Kitchen (gmail) (Apr 25)
- Re: The FCC is planning new net neutrality rules. And they could enshrine pay-for-play. - The Washington Post Miles Fidelman (Apr 25)
- Re: The FCC is planning new net neutrality rules. And they could enshrine pay-for-play. - The Washington Post Andris Kalnozols (Apr 24)
- Message not available
- Re: The FCC is planning new net neutrality rules. And they could enshrine pay-for-play. - The Washington Post Larry Sheldon (Apr 24)
- RE: The FCC is planning new net neutrality rules. And they could enshrine pay-for-play. - The Washington Post Kiriki Delany (Apr 24)
- Re: The FCC is planning new net neutrality rules. And they could enshrine pay-for-play. - The Washington Post Patrick W. Gilmore (Apr 24)
- Message not available
- Re: The FCC is planning new net neutrality rules. And they could enshrine pay-for-play. - The Washington Post Larry Sheldon (Apr 24)
- Message not available
- Re: The FCC is planning new net neutrality rules. And they could enshrine pay-for-play. - The Washington Post Larry Sheldon (Apr 24)
- Re: The FCC is planning new net neutrality rules. And they could enshrine pay-for-play. - The Washington Post Patrick W. Gilmore (Apr 25)
- Re: The FCC is planning new net neutrality rules. And they could enshrine pay-for-play. - The Washington Post Jeroen Massar (Apr 25)
- Re: The FCC is planning new net neutrality rules. And they could enshrine pay-for-play. - The Washington Post Daniel Taylor (Apr 25)
- Re: The FCC is planning new net neutrality rules. And they could enshrine pay-for-play. - The Washington Post Jack Bates (Apr 25)
- Message not available
- Re: The FCC is planning new net neutrality rules. And they could enshrine pay-for-play. - The Washington Post Larry Sheldon (Apr 25)
