nanog mailing list archives
Re: Dealing with abuse complaints to non-existent contacts
From: "John Levine" <johnl () iecc com>
Date: 10 Aug 2014 17:08:02 -0000
My e-mail bounced back from both recipients. Once being rejected by filter and the other because the e-mail address doesn't exist. I would have thought that contact details are rather important to be up to date, or not?
Opinions vary. Some providers would rather just cash the customers' checks and not waste valuable staff time on complaints in languages they can barely read. After you block all traffic from the network (in my experience, if they have bogus contacts, they have nothing of interest to say), you might send a note to APNIC telling them that they might want to note that those contacts are invalid. R's, John
Current thread:
- Re: Dealing with abuse complaints to non-existent contacts, (continued)
- Re: Dealing with abuse complaints to non-existent contacts David Conrad (Aug 10)
- Re: Dealing with abuse complaints to non-existent contacts goemon (Aug 10)
- Re: Dealing with abuse complaints to non-existent contacts Gabriel Marais (Aug 10)
- Re: Dealing with abuse complaints to non-existent contacts John Levine (Aug 11)
- Re: Dealing with abuse complaints to non-existent contacts Owen DeLong (Aug 10)
- Re: Dealing with abuse complaints to non-existent contacts Mark Andrews (Aug 10)
- Re: Dealing with abuse complaints to non-existent contacts Suresh Ramasubramanian (Aug 10)
- RE: Dealing with abuse complaints to non-existent contacts Tony Hain (Aug 10)
- Re: Dealing with abuse complaints to non-existent contacts Suresh Ramasubramanian (Aug 10)
- Re: Dealing with abuse complaints to non-existent contacts Christopher Rogers (Aug 10)
- Re: Dealing with abuse complaints to non-existent contacts Alexander Merniy (Aug 10)
- Re: Dealing with abuse complaints to non-existent contacts Mike Hale (Aug 10)
- Re: Dealing with abuse complaints to non-existent contacts Rich Kulawiec (Aug 11)
