Re: Urgent

[Hugo Slabbert <hugo () slabnet com>]

> Per Michael Valentine Smith 127.0.0.1 should work.

This also has the benefit of working over IPv6 (::1) without violating  
the ineffibility Karl referred to.

Although, technically, since many gods are omnipresent, shouldn't you  
just be able to send the packet to any address and it will be  
received?  I'm not clear on the implementation details as I would  
assume the gods would need to be in promiscuous mode for that to work  
and I'm pretty sure that would pose a problem for some gods that are  
said to be omnipresent...

----- Message from Joe Hamelin <joe () nethead com> ---------
   Date: Mon, 18 Aug 2014 11:15:39 -0700
   From: Joe Hamelin <joe () nethead com>
Subject: Re: Urgent
     To: Randy Bush <randy () psg com>
     Cc: NANOG list <nanog () nanog org>


> On Mon, Aug 18, 2014 at 10:00 AM, <randy () psg com> wrote:
>
> > Contact for God, please reach out to me offlist.
> Per Michael Valentine Smith 127.0.0.1 should work.
>
> --
> Joe Hamelin, W7COM, Tulalip, WA, 360-474-7474


----- End message from Joe Hamelin <joe () nethead com> -----



--
Hugo