nanog mailing list archives
Re: Muni Fiber and Politics
From: Owen DeLong <owen () delong com>
Date: Sat, 2 Aug 2014 10:24:40 -0700
Such a case is unlikely. On Aug 1, 2014, at 13:32, Scott Helms <khelms () zcorum com> wrote:
I can never see a case where letting them play at Layer 3 or above helps. That’s bad news, stay away. But I think some well crafted L2 services could actually _expand_ consumer choice. I mean running a dark fiber GigE to supply voice only makes no sense, but a 10M channel on a GPON serving a VoIP box may…Even in those cases where there isn't a layer 3 operator nor a chance for a viable resale of layer 1/2 services.
Current thread:
- Re: Muni Fiber and Politics, (continued)
- Re: Muni Fiber and Politics Mark Tinka (Aug 01)
- Re: Muni Fiber and Politics mcfbbqroast . (Aug 01)
- Re: Muni Fiber and Politics Mark Tinka (Aug 01)
- Re: Muni Fiber and Politics John Osmon (Aug 01)
- Re: Muni Fiber and Politics Mark Tinka (Aug 01)
- Re: Muni Fiber and Politics Owen DeLong (Aug 01)
- Re: Muni Fiber and Politics Corey Touchet (Aug 01)
- Re: Muni Fiber and Politics Owen DeLong (Aug 01)
- Re: Muni Fiber and Politics Leo Bicknell (Aug 01)
- Re: Muni Fiber and Politics Scott Helms (Aug 01)
- Re: Muni Fiber and Politics Leo Bicknell (Aug 01)
- Re: Muni Fiber and Politics Owen DeLong (Aug 02)
- Re: Muni Fiber and Politics Scott Helms (Aug 02)
- Re: Muni Fiber and Politics Leo Bicknell (Aug 02)
- Re: Muni Fiber and Politics Corey Touchet (Aug 02)
- Re: Muni Fiber and Politics Jima (Aug 05)
- Re: Muni Fiber and Politics Owen DeLong (Aug 02)
- Re: Muni Fiber and Politics Owen DeLong (Aug 02)
- Re: Muni Fiber and Politics William Herrin (Aug 04)
- Re: Muni Fiber and Politics Owen DeLong (Aug 04)
- Re: Muni Fiber and Politics William Herrin (Aug 04)
- Re: Muni Fiber and Politics Owen DeLong (Aug 04)
