nanog mailing list archives
Re: Muni Fiber and Politics
From: John Osmon <josmon () rigozsaurus com>
Date: Wed, 6 Aug 2014 11:08:10 -0600
On Wed, Aug 06, 2014 at 10:23:55AM -0500, Leo Bicknell wrote: [...]
By drawing an (admittedly somewhat arbitrary) boundary between L1/L2 and L3-L7, I think a situation can be created where there is maximum flexibility on both sides of that boundary, and the least chance of "stupidity" from players on either side.
I know of areas where multiple ISPs would welcome lit layer 2 services, because of unfamiliarity with provisioning such. So a mixed L1/L2 service where providers can "grow into" things could be very attractive in creating competition.
Current thread:
- Re: Muni Fiber and Politics, (continued)
- Re: Muni Fiber and Politics Owen DeLong (Aug 02)
- Re: Muni Fiber and Politics Owen DeLong (Aug 02)
- Re: Muni Fiber and Politics William Herrin (Aug 04)
- Re: Muni Fiber and Politics Owen DeLong (Aug 04)
- Re: Muni Fiber and Politics William Herrin (Aug 04)
- Re: Muni Fiber and Politics Owen DeLong (Aug 04)
- Re: Muni Fiber and Politics Miles Fidelman (Aug 04)
- Re: Muni Fiber and Politics Owen DeLong (Aug 04)
- Re: Muni Fiber and Politics Jay Ashworth (Aug 04)
- Re: Muni Fiber and Politics Leo Bicknell (Aug 06)
- Re: Muni Fiber and Politics John Osmon (Aug 06)
- Re: Muni Fiber and Politics Joly MacFie (Aug 01)
- Re: Muni Fiber and Politics Owen DeLong (Aug 02)
- Re: Muni Fiber and Politics Mark Tinka (Aug 02)
- Re: Muni Fiber and Politics Owen DeLong (Aug 02)
- Re: Muni Fiber and Politics Owen DeLong (Aug 01)
- Re: Muni Fiber and Politics Jay Ashworth (Aug 01)
- Re: Muni Fiber and Politics Mark Tinka (Aug 02)
- Re: Muni Fiber and Politics Owen DeLong (Aug 02)
- Re: Muni Fiber and Politics Jay Ashworth (Aug 04)
