nanog mailing list archives

Re: ARIN's RPKI Relying agreement


From: John Curran <jcurran () arin net>
Date: Thu, 4 Dec 2014 17:53:02 +0000

On Dec 4, 2014, at 12:32 PM, George, Wes <wesley.george () twcable com> wrote:
Those are operational matters, implemented by the staff, governed by the
board, who is informed by their legal council and staff. That is part of
the reason why I brought some of the issues to the NANOG community, since
interaction with ARIN board members and staff is what's necessary to make
sure the concerns are addressed, and thus it benefits from wider
discussion.

Wes - 
 
  I am happy to champion the change that you seek (i.e. will get it reviewed 
  by legal and brought before the ARIN Board) but still need clarity on what 
  change you wish to occur -

     A) Implicit binding to the indemnification/warrant disclaimer clauses
        (as done by the other RIRs)

     B) Removal of the indemnification & warranty disclaimer clause 

  I asked this directly during your NANOG presentation, but you did not respond 
  either way.  I also noted that your own business customer agreements have the 
  same indemnification & non-warranty clauses (as they are common in nearly all
  telecommunication and ISP service agreements) - are these now being dropped
  by TWC in agreements?

Thanks!
/John

John Curran
President and CEO
ARIN


Current thread: