nanog mailing list archives
Re: Feedback Requested: Routing Resilience Manifesto
From: Suresh Ramasubramanian <ops.lists () gmail com>
Date: Thu, 3 Jul 2014 14:01:25 +0530
On Thu, Jul 3, 2014 at 1:00 PM, David Hofstee <david () mailplus nl> wrote:
About #3... I had a little discussion on abuse-wg@RIPE a while ago about keeping records up to date and relevant. See below. Nobody at RIPE cares much at the moment (to actually pick up this subject). Maybe they need a push with a TerexRH400.
You get a lot of network and DNS types and maybe 1% of them will be concerned with the mechanics of abuse prevention - that's the other group down the hall, and "they are not the internet police". Ah well .. maybe that's better than hamfisted lanham act takedowns of whitehat dynamic dns providers - but those are two extremes. --srs -- Suresh Ramasubramanian (ops.lists () gmail com)
Current thread:
- Re: Feedback Requested: Routing Resilience Manifesto, (continued)
- Re: Feedback Requested: Routing Resilience Manifesto Jared Mauch (Jul 02)
- Message not available
- Re: Feedback Requested: Routing Resilience Manifesto Larry Sheldon (Jul 02)
- Re: Feedback Requested: Routing Resilience Manifesto Jared Mauch (Jul 02)
- Re: Feedback Requested: Routing Resilience Manifesto William Herrin (Jul 02)
- Re: Feedback Requested: Routing Resilience Manifesto goemon (Jul 02)
- Re: Feedback Requested: Routing Resilience Manifesto Valdis . Kletnieks (Jul 02)
- Re: Feedback Requested: Routing Resilience Manifesto Larry Sheldon (Jul 02)
- Re: Feedback Requested: Routing Resilience Manifesto Bill Woodcock (Jul 02)
- Re: Feedback Requested: Routing Resilience Manifesto Suresh Ramasubramanian (Jul 03)
- Message not available
- Re: Feedback Requested: Routing Resilience Manifesto Larry Sheldon (Jul 03)
