nanog mailing list archives
Re: Muni Fiber and Politics
From: Tom Hill <tom () ninjabadger net>
Date: Mon, 21 Jul 2014 21:16:36 +0100
On 21/07/14 18:19, Jay Ashworth wrote:
Well, if they are provisioned for it, and if they don't (continue to) impose the silly "you can't run a server on a consumer circuit" crap they traditionally have.
It might improve their ratios if they did relax that... Eventually.
I just have no faith that all the dominos are lined up in the proper direction...
Indeed; quite hard to be trusting at this point. Tom
Current thread:
- Muni Fiber and Politics Jay Ashworth (Jul 21)
- Re: Muni Fiber and Politics Jason Iannone (Jul 21)
- Re: Muni Fiber and Politics Jay Ashworth (Jul 21)
- Re: Muni Fiber and Politics Jared Mauch (Jul 21)
- Re: Muni Fiber and Politics Jay Ashworth (Jul 21)
- Re: Muni Fiber and Politics Tom Hill (Jul 21)
- Re: Muni Fiber and Politics Jay Ashworth (Jul 21)
- Re: Muni Fiber and Politics Scott Helms (Jul 21)
- Re: Muni Fiber and Politics Matthew Petach (Jul 21)
- Re: Muni Fiber and Politics William Herrin (Jul 21)
- Re: Muni Fiber and Politics Jason Iannone (Jul 21)
- Re: Muni Fiber and Politics Christopher Morrow (Jul 21)
- Re: Muni Fiber and Politics Jay Ashworth (Jul 21)
- Re: Muni Fiber and Politics Scott Helms (Jul 21)
- Re: Muni Fiber and Politics Jay Ashworth (Jul 21)
- Re: Muni Fiber and Politics Jason Iannone (Jul 21)
- Re: Muni Fiber and Politics Jay Ashworth (Jul 21)
- Re: Muni Fiber and Politics Jason Iannone (Jul 21)
