nanog mailing list archives
Re: Hurricane Electric packet loss
From: Nicolas Chabbey <nchabbey () n3network ch>
Date: Tue, 22 Jul 2014 14:23:01 +0200
Forget about it. The delay are correct, my mistake. I should look more carefully.
I also been a regular customer of HE, and always been satisfied with their service, especially regarding the IPv6 transit.
On 07/22/2014 02:13 PM, Nicolas Chabbey wrote:
Hello,Did you notice the average RTT delay from the 5th hop and beyond? I'm not sure if you can trust the values according to the high packet loss, but it may indicate an additional problem (or MAY confirm your assumption about congestion).On 07/22/2014 11:48 AM, Wolfgang Nagele (AusRegistry) wrote:Hi,We’ve been customers of Hurricane Electric for a number of years now and always been happy with their service.In recent months packet loss on some of their major routes has become a very common (every few days) occurrence. Without knowledge of their network I am unsure what’s the cause of it but we’ve seen it on the Tokyo - US routes as well as the London - US routes. It reminds me of the Cogent expansion which was carried out by unsustainable oversubscription which eventually resulted in unusable service for a number of years. Having seen some of the rates that HE has been selling for I can’t help but wonder if they made the same mistake ...Here is an example of what’s going on again atm.HOST: prolocation01.ring.nlnog.ne Loss% Snt Last Avg Best Wrst StDev 1.|-- 2a00:d00:ff:136::253 0.0% 11 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.4 0.0 2.|-- 2a00:d00:1:12::1 0.0% 10 0.7 0.8 0.7 1.1 0.1 3.|-- hurricane-electric.nikhef 0.0% 10 0.7 3.1 0.7 8.3 2.9 4.|-- 100ge9-1.core1.lon2.he.ne 0.0% 10 9.8 12.6 8.0 19.2 4.1 5.|-- 100ge1-1.core1.nyc4.he.ne 10.0% 10 74.7 74.6 73.7 80.8 2.3 6.|-- 10ge10-3.core1.lax1.he.ne 30.0% 10 133.4 138.0 133.4 145.1 4.8 7.|-- 10ge1-3.core1.lax2.he.net 20.0% 10 135.7 139.1 133.4 145.1 4.5 8.|-- 2001:504:13::3b 40.0% 10 143.2 143.1 142.1 144.4 0.8 9.|-- 2402:7800:100:1::55 50.0% 10 144.4 144.1 143.8 144.4 0.2 10.|-- 2402:7800:0:1::f6 60.0% 10 298.7 298.4 298.2 298.7 0.2 11.|-- ge-0-1-4.cor02.syd03.nsw. 10.0% 10 299.3 298.9 298.3 299.5 0.5 12.|-- 2402:7800:0:2::18a 20.0% 10 299.7 299.4 298.9 300.1 0.4 13.|-- 2001:dcd:12::10 30.0% 10 299.8 299.5 298.8 300.0 0.5Is anybody else observing this as well? Cheers, Wolfgang
Current thread:
- Hurricane Electric packet loss Wolfgang Nagele (AusRegistry) (Jul 22)
- Re: Hurricane Electric packet loss sthaug (Jul 22)
- Re: Hurricane Electric packet loss Wolfgang Nagele (AusRegistry) (Jul 22)
- Re: Hurricane Electric packet loss Mehmet Akcin (Jul 22)
- Re: Hurricane Electric packet loss Wolfgang Nagele (AusRegistry) (Jul 22)
- Re: Hurricane Electric packet loss Mehmet Akcin (Jul 22)
- Re: Hurricane Electric packet loss Reid Fishler (Jul 22)
- Re: Hurricane Electric packet loss Wolfgang Nagele (AusRegistry) (Jul 22)
- Re: Hurricane Electric packet loss Wolfgang Nagele (AusRegistry) (Jul 22)
- Re: Hurricane Electric packet loss sthaug (Jul 22)
- Re: Hurricane Electric packet loss Nicolas Chabbey (Jul 22)
- Re: Hurricane Electric packet loss Nicolas Chabbey (Jul 22)
- Re: Hurricane Electric packet loss Tim Heckman (Jul 22)
- Fwd: Hurricane Electric packet loss Shawn L (Jul 22)
- Message not available
- Re: Fwd: Hurricane Electric packet loss Clayton Zekelman (Jul 22)
- Fwd: Hurricane Electric packet loss Shawn L (Jul 22)
