nanog mailing list archives
Re: Ars Technica on IPv4 exhaustion
From: "John Levine" <johnl () iecc com>
Date: 20 Jun 2014 15:09:18 -0000
So in my book, "some" v6 support is actually worse than "none"
That has been my experience. The eyeballs are not happy. R's, John
Current thread:
- Re: Ars Technica on IPv4 exhaustion, (continued)
- Re: Ars Technica on IPv4 exhaustion Christopher Morrow (Jun 19)
- Re: Ars Technica on IPv4 exhaustion Barry Shein (Jun 19)
- Re: Ars Technica on IPv4 exhaustion Valdis . Kletnieks (Jun 19)
- Re: Ars Technica on IPv4 exhaustion Owen DeLong (Jun 19)
- Re: Ars Technica on IPv4 exhaustion Barry Shein (Jun 19)
- Re: Ars Technica on IPv4 exhaustion Valdis . Kletnieks (Jun 19)
- Re: Ars Technica on IPv4 exhaustion Owen DeLong (Jun 19)
- Re: Ars Technica on IPv4 exhaustion joel jaeggli (Jun 18)
- Re: Ars Technica on IPv4 exhaustion Matthew Kaufman (Jun 18)
- Re: Ars Technica on IPv4 exhaustion Jay Ashworth (Jun 20)
- Re: Ars Technica on IPv4 exhaustion John Levine (Jun 20)
- Re: Ars Technica on IPv4 exhaustion George, Wes (Jun 18)
- Re: Ars Technica on IPv4 exhaustion Karl Auer (Jun 18)
- Re: Ars Technica on IPv4 exhaustion Lee Howard (Jun 19)
- Re: Ars Technica on IPv4 exhaustion Mark Tinka (Jun 18)
- Re: Ars Technica on IPv4 exhaustion Owen DeLong (Jun 19)
- Re: Ars Technica on IPv4 exhaustion Lee Howard (Jun 19)
- Re: Ars Technica on IPv4 exhaustion Brian Hartsfield (Jun 19)
- Re: Ars Technica on IPv4 exhaustion Lee Howard (Jun 19)
- Re: Ars Technica on IPv4 exhaustion Justin M. Streiner (Jun 19)
- Re: Ars Technica on IPv4 exhaustion John Curran (Jun 19)
