nanog mailing list archives
Re: misunderstanding scale (was: Ipv4 end, its fake.)
From: Bryan Socha <bryan () digitalocean com>
Date: Sat, 22 Mar 2014 05:25:58 -0400
Fair point. There are some situations that do need more than most, but aren't they the ones that should be on ipv6 already??????? I know a few are shouldn't I be on ipv6 and that's fair too. I'm plqnnning some speaking engagements to cover that. Its not blind and ignoring. On Mar 22, 2014 4:36 AM, "TJ" <trejrco () gmail com> wrote:
Millions of IPs don't matter in the face of X billions of people, and XX-XXX billions of devices - and this is just the near term estimate. (And don't forget utilization efficiency - Millions of IPs is not millions of customers served.) Do IPv6. /TJ On Mar 22, 2014 3:09 AM, "Bryan Socha" <bryan () digitalocean com> wrote:As someone growing in the end of ipv4, its all fake. Sure, the rirswillrun out, but that's boring. Don't believe the fake auction sites. Fair price of IP at the end is $1 for bad Rep $2 for barely used, $3 fornospam and $4 for legacy. Stop the inflation. Millions of IPS exist, there is no shortage and don't lie for rirs with IPS left.
Current thread:
- misunderstanding scale (was: Ipv4 end, its fake.) TJ (Mar 22)
- Re: misunderstanding scale (was: Ipv4 end, its fake.) Bryan Socha (Mar 22)
- Re: misunderstanding scale Robert Webb (Mar 22)
- Re: misunderstanding scale Doug Barton (Mar 22)
- Re: misunderstanding scale Nick Hilliard (Mar 22)
- Re: misunderstanding scale George William Herbert (Mar 22)
- Re: misunderstanding scale Tore Anderson (Mar 22)
- Re: misunderstanding scale Nick Hilliard (Mar 22)
- Re: misunderstanding scale Justin M. Streiner (Mar 22)
- Re: misunderstanding scale Nick Hilliard (Mar 22)
- Re: misunderstanding scale Justin M. Streiner (Mar 22)
- Re: misunderstanding scale Michael Hallgren (Mar 22)
- Re: misunderstanding scale Robert Webb (Mar 22)
- Re: misunderstanding scale (was: Ipv4 end, its fake.) Bryan Socha (Mar 22)
