nanog mailing list archives

Re: A case against vendor-locking optical modules


From: "Justin M. Streiner" <streiner () cluebyfour org>
Date: Mon, 17 Nov 2014 15:31:31 -0500 (EST)

On Mon, 17 Nov 2014, Jérôme Nicolle wrote:

What are other arguments against vendor lock-in ? Is there any argument
FOR such locks (please spare me the support issues, if you can't read
specs and SNMP, you shouldn't even try networking) ?

Did you ever experience a shift in a vendor's position regarding the use
of compatible modules ?

In the case of some vendors (yes, you again, Cisco), the shift has been in the wrong direction.

Some vendors treat optics as just a tool to do a job, and price accordingly. Those vendors tend to have fairly relaxed policies re: working with non-$vendor optics, as well.

Other vendors treat optics as a cash cow^H^H^H^H^H^H^H^Hprofit center, and also price accordingly. Those vendors tend to scream bloody murder if a non-$vendor optic is encountered.

Beyond that, I'd say you've covered all of the logical reasons why vendor lock-in is a bad idea, but as others have mentioned in this thread, those attitudes tend to change at a ridiculously slow pace, and only when forced by market conditions.

jms


Current thread: