nanog mailing list archives

Re: BGP Security Research Question


From: Yuri Slobodyanyuk <yuri () yurisk info>
Date: Tue, 4 Nov 2014 15:45:40 +0200

Let me disagree - Pakistan Youtube was possible only because their uplink
provider did NOT implement inbound route filters . As always the weakest
link is human factor - and no super-duper newest technology is ever to help
here .
As regards to S-bgp/soBGP from technical point of view , wait for the day
when the vulnerability gets published (SSL-heartbleed style) that
invalidates all this PKI stuff ...
Yuri

On Tue, Nov 4, 2014 at 2:38 PM, <sthaug () nethelp no> wrote:

In real life people use - bgp ttl security, md5 passwords, control plane
protection of 179 port, inbound/outbound routes filters. So far this has
been enough.

These mechanisms do little or nothing to protect against unauthorized
origination of routing information. There are plenty of examples which
say it has *not* been enough, see for instance the Pakistan Telecom -
Youtube incident in 2008.

Steinar Haug, Nethelp consulting, sthaug () nethelp no




-- 
Taking challenges one by one.
http://yurisk.info


Current thread: