nanog mailing list archives
Re: Is it unusual to remove defunct rr objects?
From: Jared Mauch <jared () puck Nether net>
Date: Sat, 1 Nov 2014 10:04:56 -0400
On Sat, Nov 01, 2014 at 02:30:06PM +0900, Randy Bush wrote:
So who do we ask about making IRRs expire defunct objectsyou might start with a rigorous definition of defunct
I have my own ideas on this topic, including routes that have
not been seen for over 1 year. You may always miss the routes that
are not 'seen' on the public internet though. I'm still reminded of
the question on the internic forms in early 90s about "will you be
connecting to the internet" when asking for address space.
- Jared
--
Jared Mauch | pgp key available via finger from jared () puck nether net
clue++; | http://puck.nether.net/~jared/ My statements are only mine.
Current thread:
- Re: Is it unusual to remove defunct rr objects? Randy Bush (Oct 31)
- Re: Is it unusual to remove defunct rr objects? Jared Mauch (Nov 01)
- Re: Is it unusual to remove defunct rr objects? Jimmy Hess (Nov 01)
- Re: Is it unusual to remove defunct rr objects? Rob Seastrom (Nov 01)
- Re: Is it unusual to remove defunct rr objects? Baldur Norddahl (Nov 02)
- Re: Is it unusual to remove defunct rr objects? Rob Seastrom (Nov 02)
- Re: Is it unusual to remove defunct rr objects? Jimmy Hess (Nov 01)
- Re: Is it unusual to remove defunct rr objects? Jared Mauch (Nov 01)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: Is it unusual to remove defunct rr objects? Ca By (Nov 01)
- Re: Is it unusual to remove defunct rr objects? Tim Howe (Nov 01)
