nanog mailing list archives
Re: .sj/.bv == privacy?
From: Valdis.Kletnieks () vt edu
Date: Wed, 01 Oct 2014 12:43:56 -0400
On Wed, 01 Oct 2014 09:08:19 -0700, Dave Crocker said:
In other words, anything that explicitly identifies traffic as attempting greater privacy is likely to be a greater target for attack.
Which is a good reason to encrypt all network traffic by default, even if it's just videos of kittens. You can still figure out a lot by doing endpoint analysis, but it's a start (especially if one endpoint is an 800 pound gorilla that can serve up almost anything).
Attachment:
_bin
Description:
Current thread:
- .sj/.bv == privacy? Jay Ashworth (Oct 01)
- Re: .sj/.bv == privacy? Mehmet Akcin (Oct 01)
- Re: .sj/.bv == privacy? Dave Crocker (Oct 01)
- Re: .sj/.bv == privacy? Valdis . Kletnieks (Oct 01)
