nanog mailing list archives

Re: Marriott wifi blocking


From: Gregory Moberg <gmoberg () logmatrix com>
Date: Fri, 3 Oct 2014 16:28:14 -0400

I would think this would not sit very well with the providers.  They've
likely installed equip nearby to the hotel & conv.ctr in order to
adequately handle the concentration of devices at that location.  True?

On Fri, Oct 3, 2014 at 4:16 PM, Michael O Holstein <
michael.holstein () csuohio edu> wrote:

legality is questionable insofar as "this device must not cause harmful
interference" of PartB
but how it works is by sending DEAUTH packets with spoofed MAC addresses
"rouge AP" response on Cisco/Aruba works like this.

Regards,

Michael Holstein
Cleveland State University
________________________________________
From: NANOG <nanog-bounces () nanog org> on behalf of David Hubbard <
dhubbard () dino hostasaurus com>
Sent: Friday, October 03, 2014 4:06 PM
To: NANOG
Subject: Marriott wifi blocking

Saw this article:

http://www.cnn.com/2014/10/03/travel/marriott-fcc-wi-fi-fine/

The interesting part:

'A federal investigation of the Gaylord Opryland Resort and
Convention Center in Nashville found that Marriott employees
had used "containment features of a Wi-Fi monitoring system"
at the hotel to prevent people from accessing their own
personal Wi-Fi networks.'

I'm aware of how the illegal wifi blocking devices work, but
any idea what legal hardware they were using to effectively
keep their own wifi available but render everyone else's
inaccessible?

David




-- 
Greg Moberg, Director, NerveCenter Engineering
LogMatrix, Inc |  http://www.logmatrix.com/ | CommunityForum
<http://community.logmatrix.com/LogMatrix/> | Blog
<http://www.logmatrix.com/Blog>
Telephone: +1 (800)892-3646
<http://www.logmatrix.com> <http://www.twitter.com/NerveCenter>
<http://www.linkedin.com/company/logmatrix?trk=ppro_cprof>
<https://www.facebook.com/Logmatrix?sk=page_insights>
<http://www.youtube.com/user/logmatrixchannel>


Current thread: