nanog mailing list archives

Re: Linux: concerns over systemd adoption and Debian's decision to switch [OT]


From: Jay Ashworth <jra () baylink com>
Date: Fri, 24 Oct 2014 16:29:48 -0400 (EDT)

----- Original Message -----
From: "Lamar Owen" <lowen () pari edu>

Speaking from my own experience, the actually relevant and
package-specific guts of the typical initscript could be easily
replaced by a simple text configuration that simply gives:

1.) What to start
2.) When to start it (traditional initscripts work on a linear
timeline
of priority slots; systemd units have more flexibility)
3.) How to start it (command line options)

This should not need to be an executable script. This is what systemd
brings to the table (Upstart brought some of this, too). 

That is a perfectly valid point.  We don't dislike systemd because it does
that. We dislike it because it doesn't *only* do that.

Cheers,
-- jr 'see also IPv6' a
-- 
Jay R. Ashworth                  Baylink                       jra () baylink com
Designer                     The Things I Think                       RFC 2100
Ashworth & Associates       http://www.bcp38.info          2000 Land Rover DII
St Petersburg FL USA      BCP38: Ask For It By Name!           +1 727 647 1274


Current thread: