nanog mailing list archives

Re: Scotland ccTLD?


From: David Conrad <drc () virtualized org>
Date: Wed, 17 Sep 2014 07:32:38 -0700

On Sep 17, 2014, at 7:17 AM, Jens Link <lists () quux de> wrote:
Owen DeLong <owen () delong com> writes:
On Sep 16, 2014, at 8:55 AM, Majdi S. Abbas <msa () latt net> wrote:
    su is not available.
I think it is now, since the break up of the Soviet Union.

No it is not.

A friend told me that .su domains are quite common in windows
environments after the admins discovered that .local is not a good
choice. ;-)

That would be an *exceptionally* bad idea.  If queries to those domains leaked out of the local environment (which, of 
course, _never_ happens), they could be resolved simply by purchasing the .SU domain and then setting up name servers 
with a wildcard to return an address for a honeypot.  The bad guys could then just sit and wait (and then profit).  
This is a form of ‘name collision’ which is all the rage these days (see 
https://www.icann.org/resources/pages/name-collision-2013-12-06-en).

Regards,
-drc

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail


Current thread: