nanog mailing list archives
Bright House IMAP highwater warning real?
From: Jay Ashworth <jra () baylink com>
Date: Sun, 02 Aug 2015 14:54:45 -0400
Any brighthouse email admins on the list? My sister got the following high water warning message, with the included headers which, since they appear to include no Received: headers, look like they actually came from brighthouse's email cluster. If this is a real Bright House warning message, somebody should be flogged. Teaching people which messages is to believe is hard enough... Cheers, -- jra -------- Original Message -------- Subject: Re: Fwd: ATTENTION: High Water Mark Notification, bytes in the mailbox! I lied. The header to yours - which I finally found - is nice and long. the header on this one is Return-Path: <> From: admin Subject: ATTENTION: High Water Mark Notification, bytes in the mailbox! Date: Sun, 2 Aug 2015 06:22:44 +0000 Message-ID: e31468ce-38de-11e5-b0a6-17507733086b
-----Original Message----- From: admin Sent: Sun, 02 Aug 2015 2:22 AM Subject: ATTENTION: High Water Mark Notification, bytes in themailbox!Your mailbox is over the high water mark. Please delete some messages from your mailbox.
-- Sent from my Android phone with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my brevity.
Current thread:
- Bright House IMAP highwater warning real? Jay Ashworth (Aug 02)
- RE: Bright House IMAP highwater warning real? Frank Bulk (Aug 02)
- RE: Bright House IMAP highwater warning real? Jay Ashworth (Aug 02)
- Re: Bright House IMAP highwater warning real? Robert Drake (Aug 05)
- Message not available
- Re: Bright House IMAP highwater warning real? Edwin Mallette (Aug 05)
- RE: Bright House IMAP highwater warning real? Jay Ashworth (Aug 02)
- Re: RE: Bright House IMAP highwater warning real? tqr2813d376cjozqap1l (Aug 02)
- RE: Bright House IMAP highwater warning real? Frank Bulk (Aug 02)
